Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Central Asia
Central Asia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of was 27.0% in 2012. ▲ Rising
Latest (2012)
27.0%
Change on year
down 3.6%
Rank
12th
of 29 groups
All-time high
28.0%
in 2004
All-time low
19.0%
in 2003
Years of data
10
2003–2012
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Central Asia, 2003–2012
Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Measured in %.
Analysis
Central Asia recorded 27.0% for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in 2012.
The figure is down 3.6% on the previous year and up 42.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Central Asia peaked at 28.0% in 2004 and was at its lowest, 19.0%, in 2003.
That places Central Asia 12th out of 29 groups with data for 2012, putting it in the middle of the range.
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Central Asia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 19.0% | — |
| 2004 | 28.0% | +47.4% |
| 2005 | 28.0% | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 28.0% | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 28.0% | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 28.0% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 28.0% | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 28.0% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 28.0% | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 27.0% | -3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.7% | 19.0% | 28.0% | 7 |
| 2010s | 27.7% | 27.0% | 28.0% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Central Asia
- 9 Belgium 63.0% compare
- 10 Zimbabwe 60.0% compare
- 11 El Salvador 50.0% compare
- 11 Turkmenistan 50.0% compare
- 13 New Zealand 48.0% compare
- 14 Australia and New Zealand 47.0% compare
- 15 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 46.0% compare
- 15 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 46.0% compare
More infrastructure data for Central Asia
- Proportion of children moderately or severely stunted 7.4% (2024)
- Proportion of children moderately or severely overweight 6.4% (2024)
- Proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of 93.0% (2024)
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global 0.5% (2024)
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global 0.5% (2024)
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global 0.4% (2024)
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global 0.3% (2024)
- Proportion of population practicing open defecation, by urban/rural 0.0% (2024)
- Total official flows for infrastructure, by recipient countries 4,683 million constant US$ (2024)
- Total reserves in months of imports 7.67 ratio (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Central Asia?
- Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Central Asia was 27.0% in 2012, according to United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database.
- What is the highest proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 28.0% in 2004.
- What is the lowest proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 19.0% in 2003.
- How does Central Asia rank for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Central Asia ranks 12th out of 29 groups with data for 2012.
- Is proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 42.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as part of Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested).