Central Asia vs El Salvador: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of
Central Asia
27.0%
in 2012
El Salvador
50.0%
in 2010
Central Asia rank
12th
El Salvador rank
11th
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time
- Central Asia
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 50.0% against 27.0% in Central Asia, a difference of 23.0%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.9 times Central Asia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 12th and El Salvador ranks 11th of 29 groups.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.7% | 50.0% | 23.3% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 28.0% | 50.0% | 22.0% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Central Asia or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 50.0% against 27.0% in Central Asia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Central Asia and El Salvador?
- 23.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and El Salvador?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2010.
- How do Central Asia and El Salvador rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Central Asia ranks 12th and El Salvador ranks 11th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.