Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of

Australia and New Zealand
47.0%
in 2025
Central Asia
27.0%
in 2012
Australia and New Zealand rank
14th
Central Asia rank
12th

Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central Asia
2030405060200020122025

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 47.0% against 27.0% in Central Asia, a difference of 20.0%.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Central Asia ranks 12th of 139 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Central Asia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central Asia Difference Ahead
2000s 28.3% 26.7% 1.6% Australia and New Zealand
2010s 26.3% 27.7% 1.3% Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of, Australia and New Zealand or Central Asia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 47.0% against 27.0% in Central Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of between Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
20.0%, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central Asia rank globally for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 14th and Central Asia ranks 12th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/australia-and-new-zealand/central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-transboundary-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-as-a-share/australia-and-new-zealand/central-asia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central Asia: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
168 places, 3,169 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed