Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Serbia
Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2022. ▼ Falling
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Serbia, 2006–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.0% on the previous year and down 32.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Serbia peaked at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Serbia ranks 127th of 181 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 17 years of available data.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Serbia, year by year
| Year | billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2007 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -25.8% |
| 2008 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -17.2% |
| 2009 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +15.5% |
| 2010 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +7.9% |
| 2011 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2012 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 2013 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2014 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 2015 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +18.9% |
| 2016 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 2017 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2018 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2019 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2021 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 2022 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 4 |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 3 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 124 Trinidad and Tobago 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 125 Cape Verde 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 126 Saint Lucia 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 128 Iraq 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 129 Botswana 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 130 Austria 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
More infrastructure data for Serbia
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 8.18 million (2024)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 123.82 per 100 people (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 2.42 million (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 36.69 per 100 people (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.3679 units per person (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate -2.47 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 2.42 million (2024)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.24 units per person (2024)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Serbia?
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Serbia was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2006.
- What is the lowest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Serbia rank for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Serbia ranks 127th out of 181 countries with data for 2022.
- Is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.