Cape Verde vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Cape Verde
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Serbia
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Cape Verde rank
125th
Serbia rank
127th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Serbia
000000198020012022

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 125th and Serbia ranks 127th of 181 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Serbia
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Serbia
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Cape Verde or Serbia?
Cape Verde, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Cape Verde and Serbia?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Serbia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Cape Verde and Serbia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Cape Verde ranks 125th and Serbia ranks 127th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/serbia/">Cape Verde vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.