Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) was 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022. ▬ Flat
Latest (2022)
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Change on year
down 0.5%
Rank
42nd
of 43 groups
All-time high
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2022
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, 1961–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in billion cubic meters per square kilometre.
Analysis
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan recorded 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in 2022.
The figure is down 0.5% on the previous year and down 0.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan peaked at 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan 42nd out of 43 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, year by year
| Year | billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1963 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1993 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2008 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2016 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- 39 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 40 Vanuatu 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 41 Honduras 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 42 Bangladesh 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 43 Puerto Rico 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 44 El Salvador 0.0008 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 45 Trinidad and Tobago 0.0007 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
More infrastructure data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 884.00 million (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 107.1 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 84.00 million (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 10.2 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.1014 units per person (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate 2.44 % change on previous year (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 84.00 million (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.07 units per person (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan →
Frequently asked questions
- What is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan was 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2017.
- What is the lowest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 42nd out of 43 groups with data for 2022.
- Is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.