Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Eswatini
Eswatini: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) was 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022. ▬ Flat
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Eswatini, 1961–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in billion cubic meters per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Eswatini is 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, measured in 2022. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Eswatini peaked at 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Eswatini 122nd out of 183 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 119 Czechia 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 120 Belarus 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 121 Malta 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 123 Denmark 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 124 Palestine, State of 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 125 Senegal 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
More infrastructure data for Eswatini
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 1.74 million (2024)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 139.83 per 100 people (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 35,641 (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 2.87 per 100 people (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.0287 units per person (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate -15.02 % change on previous year (2024)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 35,641 (2024)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.4 units per person (2024)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Eswatini?
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Eswatini was 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1961.
- What is the lowest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Eswatini rank for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Eswatini ranks 122nd out of 183 countries with data for 2022.
- Is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.