Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark

Denmark: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) was 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022. ▬ Flat

Latest (2022)
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
123rd
of 183 countries
All-time high
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 1961
All-time low
0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2022

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark, 1961–2022

0000196119912022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in billion cubic meters per square kilometre.

Analysis

Denmark recorded 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in 2022. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark peaked at 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, in 1961.

That places Denmark 123rd out of 183 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark, year by year

Annual values for Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre in Denmark, 1961 to 2022.
Year billion cubic meters per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre
1962 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1963 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1964 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1965 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1966 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1967 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1968 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1969 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1970 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1971 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1972 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1973 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1974 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1975 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1976 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1977 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1978 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1979 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1980 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1981 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1982 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1983 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1984 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1985 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1986 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1987 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1988 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1989 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1990 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1991 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1992 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1993 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1994 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1995 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1996 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1997 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1998 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
1999 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2000 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2001 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2002 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2003 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2004 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2005 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2006 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2007 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2008 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2009 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2010 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2011 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2012 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2013 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2014 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2015 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2016 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2017 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2018 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2019 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2020 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2021 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%
2022 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre 3

Countries ranked near Denmark

  1. 120 Belarus 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
  2. 121 Malta 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
  3. 122 Eswatini 0.0002 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
  4. 124 Palestine, State of 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
  5. 125 Senegal 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
  6. 126 Ghana 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 229 places →

More infrastructure data for Denmark

All data for Denmark →

Frequently asked questions

What is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark?
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark was 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Denmark?
The highest recorded value was 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1961.
What is the lowest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Denmark?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Denmark rank for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Denmark ranks 123rd out of 183 countries with data for 2022.
Is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) rising or falling in Denmark?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Denmark data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/stat/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/stat/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-square-kilometre/denmark/">Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Denmark</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre
Unit
billion cubic meters per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
229 places, 13,083 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.