Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre was 69 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics stood at 69 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 30.2% on the previous year and up 116.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 69 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 5.15 units per square kilometre, in 1970.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st of 44 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 5.15 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 5.16 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1972 | 5.98 units per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1973 | 6.63 units per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1974 | 6.6 units per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1975 | 7.12 units per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1976 | 7.92 units per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1977 | 8.43 units per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1978 | 8.99 units per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1979 | 9.92 units per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1980 | 9.42 units per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1981 | 8.72 units per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1982 | 7.09 units per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 1983 | 8.06 units per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1984 | 9.03 units per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1985 | 9.48 units per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1986 | 9.39 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1987 | 9.83 units per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1988 | 10.06 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1989 | 10.41 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1990 | 9.77 units per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1991 | 6.39 units per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 1992 | 6.14 units per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1993 | 5.92 units per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1994 | 6.68 units per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1995 | 6.63 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1996 | 7.44 units per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1997 | 7.91 units per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1998 | 8.66 units per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1999 | 9.04 units per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2000 | 10.06 units per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2001 | 10.36 units per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2002 | 10.7 units per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2003 | 12.75 units per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 2004 | 15.2 units per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 2005 | 17.26 units per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2006 | 18.33 units per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2007 | 21.5 units per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2008 | 22.9 units per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2009 | 22.4 units per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2010 | 29.62 units per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 2011 | 31.22 units per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2012 | 29.43 units per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2013 | 31.89 units per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2014 | 34.25 units per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2015 | 36 units per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2016 | 38.78 units per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2017 | 47.17 units per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 2018 | 56.67 units per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 2019 | 63.29 units per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2020 | 20.35 units per square kilometre | -67.8% |
| 2021 | 27.5 units per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 2022 | 53 units per square kilometre | +92.7% |
| 2023 | 69 units per square kilometre | +30.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 7.19 units per square kilometre | 5.15 units per square kilometre | 9.92 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.15 units per square kilometre | 7.09 units per square kilometre | 10.41 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.46 units per square kilometre | 5.92 units per square kilometre | 9.77 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 16.15 units per square kilometre | 10.06 units per square kilometre | 22.9 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 39.83 units per square kilometre | 29.43 units per square kilometre | 63.29 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 42.46 units per square kilometre | 20.35 units per square kilometre | 69 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 1 Singapore 66,160 units per square kilometre compare
- 2 Macau, China 62,218 units per square kilometre compare
- 3 Hong Kong, China 24,480 units per square kilometre compare
- 4 Malta 7,461 units per square kilometre compare
More infrastructure data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 130.27 million (2022)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 124.68 per 100 people (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 15.39 million (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 14.73 per 100 people (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.1538 units per person (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate -5.49 % change on previous year (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 15.39 million (2022)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.3 units per person (2022)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics was 69 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 69 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.15 units per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is up 116.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Air transport, passengers carried ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Air transport, passengers carried Civil Aviation Statistics of the World, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.