Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
69 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
24,480 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong, China
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 24,480 units per square kilometre against 69 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 24,411 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 354.8 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 44 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 8.54 units per square kilometre 9,779 units per square kilometre 9,770 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 16.15 units per square kilometre 18,146 units per square kilometre 18,130 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 39.83 units per square kilometre 36,969 units per square kilometre 36,929 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 42.46 units per square kilometre 8,516 units per square kilometre 8,474 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 24,480 units per square kilometre against 69 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
24,411 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China rank globally for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,079 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.