Eastern Asia vs Naoero: Proportion of the target population who received
Eastern Asia
95.0%
in 2024
Naoero
99.0%
in 2024
Eastern Asia rank
2nd
Naoero rank
1st
Proportion of the target population who received over time
- Eastern Asia
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 99.0% against 95.0% in Eastern Asia, a difference of 4.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Naoero ahead.
Eastern Asia ranks 2nd and Naoero ranks 1st of 37 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eastern Asia averaged higher in 1 and Naoero in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.2% | 83.0% | 32.8% | Naoero |
| 2010s | 98.3% | 93.7% | 4.6% | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 97.4% | 98.6% | 1.2% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of the target population who received, Eastern Asia or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 99.0% against 95.0% in Eastern Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in proportion of the target population who received between Eastern Asia and Naoero?
- 4.0%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Naoero?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Eastern Asia and Naoero rank globally for proportion of the target population who received?
- Eastern Asia ranks 2nd and Naoero ranks 1st of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.