China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Estonia: Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
91.6%
in 2022
Estonia
85.0%
in 2022
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
1st
Estonia rank
4th

Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Estonia
020406080100200320122022

How they compare

China, Macao Special Administrative Region currently reports 91.6% against 85.0% in Estonia, a difference of 6.6%.

That makes China, Macao Special Administrative Region's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was China, Macao Special Administrative Region ahead.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 1st and Estonia ranks 4th of 9 groups.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Estonia Difference Ahead
2000s 89.0% 87.6% 1.4% China, Macao Special Administrative Region
2010s 92.5% 89.3% 3.2% China, Macao Special Administrative Region
2020s 91.6% 85.0% 6.5% China, Macao Special Administrative Region

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Estonia?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region, at 91.6% against 85.0% in Estonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Estonia?
6.6%, with China, Macao Special Administrative Region ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Estonia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Estonia rank globally for proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 1st and Estonia ranks 4th of 9 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Estonia: Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-children-and-young-people-achieving-a-minimum-proficiency-level-in-reading/china-macao-special-administrative-region/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/proportion-of-children-and-young-people-achieving-a-minimum-proficiency-level-in-reading/china-macao-special-administrative-region/estonia/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Estonia: Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Proportion of children and young people achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
72 places, 580 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed