Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP

Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0005 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0011 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
7th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
10th

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
000.0010.0010.001196019922025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.0011 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 2.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 10th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of gdp, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.0011 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of gdp between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0006 units per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of?
53 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of gdp?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 10th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/sub-saharan-africa/tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,883 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.