What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of gdp between Chad and IDA & IBRD total?

0.0005 units per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and IDA & IBRD total?

53 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs IDA & IBRD total: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP

Chad

0.0007 units per US$ of GDP

in 2024

IDA & IBRD total

0.0002 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chad rank

24th

IDA & IBRD total rank

23rd

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP over time

Chad
IDA & IBRD total

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chad's figure about 4.6 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1960 it was IDA & IBRD total ahead.

Chad ranks 24th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and IDA & IBRD total in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	IDA & IBRD total	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	—
1970s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	—
1980s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	IDA & IBRD total
1990s	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	0 units per US$ of GDP	IDA & IBRD total
2000s	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	0.0001 units per US$ of GDP	IDA & IBRD total
2010s	0.0003 units per US$ of GDP	0.0002 units per US$ of GDP	0.0002 units per US$ of GDP	Chad
2020s	0.0007 units per US$ of GDP	0.0002 units per US$ of GDP	0.0005 units per US$ of GDP	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of gdp, Chad or IDA & IBRD total?: Chad, at 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP in IDA & IBRD total as of 2024.
What is the difference in mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of gdp between Chad and IDA & IBRD total?: 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and IDA & IBRD total?: 53 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Chad and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of gdp?: Chad ranks 24th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs IDA & IBRD total: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Chad vs IDA & IBRD total: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 252 places, 11,883 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.