China vs Low & middle income: Container port traffic

China
299.70 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units
in 2024
Low & middle income
534.13 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units
in 2024
China rank
1st
Low & middle income rank
3rd

Container port traffic over time

  • China
  • Low & middle income
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M201020172024

How they compare

Low & middle income currently reports 534.13 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units against 299.70 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units in China, a difference of 234.42 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units.

That makes Low & middle income's figure about 1.8 times China's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Low & middle income has been ahead every year.

China ranks 1st and Low & middle income ranks 3rd of 167 countries.

Low & middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Low & middle income Difference Ahead
2010s 190.14 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units 349.46 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units 159.32 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units Low & middle income
2020s 268.94 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units 478.04 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units 209.11 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units Low & middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher container port traffic, China or Low & middle income?
Low & middle income, at 534.13 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units against 299.70 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in container port traffic between China and Low & middle income?
234.42 million TEU: 20 foot equivalent units, with Low & middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Low & middle income?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do China and Low & middle income rank globally for container port traffic?
China ranks 1st and Low & middle income ranks 3rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Container port traffic (TEU: 20 foot equivalent units). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Low & middle income: Container port traffic. Statizoid, drawing on UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/container-port-traffic-teu-20-foot-equivalent-units/china/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/container-port-traffic-teu-20-foot-equivalent-units/china/low-and-middle-income/">China vs Low & middle income: Container port traffic</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Container port traffic (TEU: 20 foot equivalent units)
Unit
TEU: 20 foot equivalent units
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,791 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes, and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.