Eswatini vs Kyrgyzstan: Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic
Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic over time
- Eswatini
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3.9% against 2.9% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 168th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 171st of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.2% | 3.1% | 0.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 3.4% | 3.0% | 0.4% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 3.9% | 2.9% | 0.9% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 3.9% | 2.9% | 0.9% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic, Eswatini or Kyrgyzstan?
- Eswatini, at 3.9% against 2.9% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic between Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
- How do Eswatini and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic?
- Eswatini ranks 168th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 171st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.