Côte d'Ivoire vs Iceland: Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic
Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 28.7% against 27.5% in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Iceland ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 69th and Iceland ranks 67th of 180 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 22.0% | 87.5% | 65.5% | Iceland |
| 1990s | 21.9% | 56.1% | 34.2% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 39.0% | 44.3% | 5.2% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 29.3% | 29.9% | 0.6% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 27.5% | 28.7% | 1.2% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic, Côte d'Ivoire or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 28.7% against 27.5% in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic between Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
- 1.2%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2022.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Iceland rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 69th and Iceland ranks 67th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.