High income vs Naoero: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre

High income
49.98 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
1,955 units per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
11th
Naoero rank
9th

Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre over time

  • High income
  • Naoero
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 1,955 units per square kilometre against 49.98 units per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 1,905 units per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 39.1 times High income's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 11th and Naoero ranks 9th of 44 groups.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Naoero Difference Ahead
2000s 31.33 units per square kilometre 10,521 units per square kilometre 10,490 units per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 42.92 units per square kilometre 1,790 units per square kilometre 1,747 units per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 33.81 units per square kilometre 815.15 units per square kilometre 781.34 units per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre, High income or Naoero?
Naoero, at 1,955 units per square kilometre against 49.98 units per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre between High income and Naoero?
1,905 units per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Naoero?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do High income and Naoero rank globally for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre?
High income ranks 11th and Naoero ranks 9th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Naoero: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/high-income/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-passengers-carried-per-square-kilometre/high-income/naoero/">High income vs Naoero: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 10,079 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.