Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of GDP

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
7th
Hong Kong, China rank
7th

Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of GDP over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Hong Kong, China
0000197019962023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP against 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 5.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th and Hong Kong, China ranks 7th of 44 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2000s 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of gdp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP against 0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of gdp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
0 million ton-km per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
18 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of gdp?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 7th and Hong Kong, China ranks 7th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-freight-million-ton-km-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/air-transport-freight-million-ton-km-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Air transport, freight (million ton-km), per unit of GDP
Unit
million ton-km per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
226 places, 9,483 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Air transport, freight (million ton-km) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.