Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Upper middle income, 1961–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Upper middle income recorded 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 62 years on record.
That represents a change of down 4.2% on the previous year and down 35.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Upper middle income peaked at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 1962 and was at its lowest, 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
That places Upper middle income 27th out of 43 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 1963 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1964 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1965 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1966 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1967 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 1968 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 1969 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1970 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 1971 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1972 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 1973 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -24.0% |
| 1974 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -22.4% |
| 1975 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1976 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -7.8% |
| 1977 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1978 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1979 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -14.2% |
| 1980 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 1981 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 1982 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 1983 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 1984 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -5.1% |
| 1985 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -2.9% |
| 1986 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 1987 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1989 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 1990 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1991 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1992 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1993 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1994 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 1995 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1996 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1997 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 1998 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1999 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +2.3% |
| 2000 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 2001 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -0.0% |
| 2002 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2003 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2004 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -15.1% |
| 2005 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2006 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 2007 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 2008 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 2009 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2010 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -18.3% |
| 2011 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -16.3% |
| 2012 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2013 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2014 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2015 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 2016 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 2017 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2018 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -6.5% |
| 2019 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 2020 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2021 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 2022 | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 3 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 24 Tajikistan 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 25 Iceland 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 26 Fiji 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 27 Belize 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 28 Mozambique 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 29 Nepal 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
- 30 Kyrgyzstan 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP compare
More infrastructure data for Upper middle income
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 3.76 billion (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 132.4 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 313.00 million (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 11 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.1017 units per person (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate -4.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 313.00 million (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.22 units per person (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Upper middle income?
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in Upper middle income was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 1962.
- What is the lowest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Upper middle income rank for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- Upper middle income ranks 27th out of 43 groups with data for 2022.
- Is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.