Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in High income
High income: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) was 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022. ▼ Falling
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in High income, 1961–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in billion cubic meters per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in High income is 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in High income peaked at 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1989 and was at its lowest, 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre, in 2020.
High income ranks 23rd of 43 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 62 years of available data.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in High income, year by year
| Year | billion cubic meters per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 20 Peru 0.0013 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 21 New Zealand 0.0012 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 22 Chile 0.0012 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 23 Japan 0.0012 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 24 Viet Nam 0.0011 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 25 Guyana 0.0011 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
- 26 Indonesia 0.0011 billion cubic meters per square kilometre compare
More infrastructure data for High income
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 2.01 billion (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 141.6 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 398.00 million (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 28 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.2795 units per person (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate -3.4 % change on previous year (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 398.00 million (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.41 units per person (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in High income?
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) in High income was 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 1989.
- What is the lowest renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0003 billion cubic meters per square kilometre in 2020.
- How does High income rank for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- High income ranks 23rd out of 43 groups with data for 2022.
- Is renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.