Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in Middle income
Middle income: Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita was 4,360 cubic meters in 2022. ▼ Falling
Latest (2022)
4,360 cubic meters
Change on year
down 0.7%
Rank
20th
of 45 groups
All-time high
13,199 cubic meters
in 1961
All-time low
4,360 cubic meters
in 2022
Years of data
62
1961–2022
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in Middle income, 1961–2022
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Measured in cubic meters.
Analysis
Middle income recorded 4,360 cubic meters for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 62 years on record.
That represents a change of down 0.7% on the previous year and down 10.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in Middle income peaked at 13,199 cubic meters in 1961 and was at its lowest, 4,360 cubic meters, in 2022.
Middle income ranks 20th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 62 years of available data.
Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in Middle income, year by year
| Year | cubic meters | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 13,199 cubic meters | — |
| 1962 | 12,986 cubic meters | -1.6% |
| 1963 | 12,660 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1964 | 12,349 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1965 | 12,047 cubic meters | -2.4% |
| 1966 | 11,741 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1967 | 11,450 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1968 | 11,165 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1969 | 10,883 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1970 | 10,607 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1971 | 10,343 cubic meters | -2.5% |
| 1972 | 10,095 cubic meters | -2.4% |
| 1973 | 9,856 cubic meters | -2.4% |
| 1974 | 9,629 cubic meters | -2.3% |
| 1975 | 9,416 cubic meters | -2.2% |
| 1976 | 9,216 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1977 | 9,026 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1978 | 8,841 cubic meters | -2.0% |
| 1979 | 8,658 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1980 | 8,477 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1981 | 8,296 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1982 | 8,115 cubic meters | -2.2% |
| 1983 | 7,942 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1984 | 7,777 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1985 | 7,615 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1986 | 7,455 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1987 | 7,298 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1988 | 7,146 cubic meters | -2.1% |
| 1989 | 7,001 cubic meters | -2.0% |
| 1990 | 6,858 cubic meters | -2.0% |
| 1991 | 6,726 cubic meters | -1.9% |
| 1992 | 6,469 cubic meters | -3.8% |
| 1993 | 6,357 cubic meters | -1.7% |
| 1994 | 6,247 cubic meters | -1.7% |
| 1995 | 6,143 cubic meters | -1.7% |
| 1996 | 6,043 cubic meters | -1.6% |
| 1997 | 5,946 cubic meters | -1.6% |
| 1998 | 5,853 cubic meters | -1.6% |
| 1999 | 5,764 cubic meters | -1.5% |
| 2000 | 5,678 cubic meters | -1.5% |
| 2001 | 5,596 cubic meters | -1.4% |
| 2002 | 5,519 cubic meters | -1.4% |
| 2003 | 5,444 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2004 | 5,371 cubic meters | -1.4% |
| 2005 | 5,300 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2006 | 5,226 cubic meters | -1.4% |
| 2007 | 5,160 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2008 | 5,095 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2009 | 5,031 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2010 | 4,968 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 4,906 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2012 | 4,844 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2013 | 4,783 cubic meters | -1.3% |
| 2014 | 4,724 cubic meters | -1.2% |
| 2015 | 4,668 cubic meters | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 4,615 cubic meters | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 4,563 cubic meters | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 4,514 cubic meters | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 4,469 cubic meters | -1.0% |
| 2020 | 4,427 cubic meters | -0.9% |
| 2021 | 4,390 cubic meters | -0.8% |
| 2022 | 4,360 cubic meters | -0.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,053 cubic meters | 10,883 cubic meters | 13,199 cubic meters | 9 |
| 1970s | 9,569 cubic meters | 8,658 cubic meters | 10,607 cubic meters | 10 |
| 1980s | 7,712 cubic meters | 7,001 cubic meters | 8,477 cubic meters | 10 |
| 1990s | 6,241 cubic meters | 5,764 cubic meters | 6,858 cubic meters | 10 |
| 2000s | 5,342 cubic meters | 5,031 cubic meters | 5,678 cubic meters | 10 |
| 2010s | 4,705 cubic meters | 4,469 cubic meters | 4,968 cubic meters | 10 |
| 2020s | 4,392 cubic meters | 4,360 cubic meters | 4,427 cubic meters | 3 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 17 Vanuatu 31,944 cubic meters compare
- 18 Fiji 31,052 cubic meters compare
- 19 Panama 31,040 cubic meters compare
- 20 Russian Federation 29,895 cubic meters compare
- 21 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 28,533 cubic meters compare
- 22 Central African Republic 27,658 cubic meters compare
- 23 Uruguay 27,190 cubic meters compare
More infrastructure data for Middle income
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 6.20 billion (2022)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 108.26 per 100 people (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 415.79 million (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 7.26 per 100 people (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.0707 units per person (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate -1.61 % change on previous year (2022)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 415.79 million (2022)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.05 units per person (2022)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in Middle income?
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita in Middle income was 4,360 cubic meters in 2022, according to AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
- What is the highest renewable internal freshwater resources per capita recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 13,199 cubic meters in 1961.
- What is the lowest renewable internal freshwater resources per capita recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 4,360 cubic meters in 2022.
- How does Middle income rank for renewable internal freshwater resources per capita?
- Middle income ranks 20th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is renewable internal freshwater resources per capita rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as part of Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country. Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita are calculated using the World Bank's population estimates.