Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Japan
Japan: Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of was 0.0% in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Japan, 2000–2017
Source: United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2017, proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Japan stood at 0.0%. That is the lowest value across all 18 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Japan peaked at 21.0% in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2016.
That places Japan 68th out of 139 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Japan, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 21.0% | — |
| 2001 | 21.0% | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 21.0% | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 21.0% | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 21.0% | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 21.0% | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 19.0% | -9.5% |
| 2007 | 19.0% | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 19.0% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 6.0% | -68.4% |
| 2010 | 6.0% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 6.0% | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 6.0% | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 6.0% | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 6.0% | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 6.0% | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0% | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.9% | 6.0% | 21.0% | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 0.0% | 6.0% | 8 |
Countries ranked near Japan
- 66 China 3.0% compare
- 66 Mexico 3.0% compare
- 68 Albania 0.0% compare
- 68 Algeria 0.0% compare
- 68 Azerbaijan 0.0%
- 68 Bangladesh 0.0% compare
- 68 Benin 0.0%
- 68 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0.0% compare
- 68 Botswana 0.0% compare
- 68 Burkina Faso 0.0%
- 68 Burundi 0.0%
- 68 Cameroon 0.0%
- 68 Chad 0.0% compare
- 68 Chile 0.0% compare
- 68 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
- 68 Côte d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 68 Cuba 0.0% compare
- 68 Cyprus 0.0%
- 68 Dominican Republic 0.0%
- 68 Ecuador 0.0% compare
- 68 Egypt 0.0% compare
- 68 Estonia 0.0% compare
- 68 Eswatini 0.0% compare
- 68 Gambia 0.0%
- 68 Ghana 0.0% compare
- 68 Greece 0.0%
- 68 Guinea 0.0%
- 68 Iceland 0.0%
- 68 Iraq 0.0%
- 68 Jordan 0.0%
- 68 Kenya 0.0%
- 68 Kiribati 0.0%
- 68 Latvia 0.0%
- 68 Lebanon 0.0%
- 68 Madagascar 0.0%
- 68 Mali 0.0%
- 68 Malta 0.0%
- 68 Mauritania 0.0%
- 68 Mauritius 0.0%
- 68 Mongolia 0.0%
- 68 Montenegro 0.0%
- 68 Mozambique 0.0%
- 68 Niger 0.0%
- 68 Nigeria 0.0%
- 68 Oman 0.0%
- 68 Pakistan 0.0%
- 68 Peru 0.0% compare
- 68 Philippines 0.0% compare
- 68 Portugal 0.0%
- 68 Qatar 0.0%
- 68 Republic of Moldova 0.0%
- 68 Romania 0.0% compare
- 68 Saint Lucia 0.0%
- 68 Samoa 0.0%
- 68 Seychelles 0.0%
- 68 State of Palestine 0.0%
- 68 Sudan 0.0%
- 68 Suriname 0.0%
- 68 Syrian Arab Republic 0.0%
- 68 Tajikistan 0.0%
- 68 Thailand 0.0%
- 68 Togo 0.0% compare
- 68 Tunisia 0.0%
- 68 Uganda 0.0%
- 68 United Republic of Tanzania 0.0% compare
- 68 Uzbekistan 0.0% compare
- 68 Viet Nam 0.0%
- 68 Yemen 0.0%
- 68 Zambia 0.0%
- 68 Côte d'Ivoire 0.0% compare
- 68 Republic of Moldova 0.0%
- 68 Syrian Arab Republic 0.0%
- 68 Viet Nam 0.0%
More infrastructure data for Japan
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 221.92 million (2023)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 178.43 per 100 people (2023)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 59.33 million (2023)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 47.7 per 100 people (2023)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.4765 units per person (2023)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate -1.94 % change on previous year (2023)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 59.33 million (2023)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 1.78 units per person (2023)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Japan?
- Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of in Japan was 0.0% in 2017, according to United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database.
- What is the highest proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Japan?
- The highest recorded value was 21.0% in 2000.
- What is the lowest proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Japan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2016.
- How does Japan rank for proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Japan ranks 68th out of 139 countries with data for 2017.
- Is proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Japan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Japan data come from?
- The figures come from United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as part of Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested).