Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only

IBRD only: Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre was 79.96 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
79.96 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.9%
Rank
13th
of 45 groups
All-time high
79.96 units per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0 units per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
51
1965–2023

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only, 1965–2023

020406080196519942023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only stood at 79.96 units per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 51 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.9% on the previous year and up 27.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only peaked at 79.96 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 units per square kilometre, in 1965.

That places IBRD only 13th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only, year by year

Annual values for Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only, 1965 to 2023.
Year units per square kilometre Change
1965 0 units per square kilometre —
1970 0 units per square kilometre —
1975 0 units per square kilometre —
1976 0 units per square kilometre —
1977 0 units per square kilometre —
1978 0 units per square kilometre —
1979 0 units per square kilometre —
1980 0 units per square kilometre —
1981 0 units per square kilometre —
1982 0 units per square kilometre —
1983 0 units per square kilometre —
1984 0 units per square kilometre —
1985 0 units per square kilometre +15.9%
1986 0.0003 units per square kilometre +714.9%
1987 0.0008 units per square kilometre +131.8%
1988 0.0015 units per square kilometre +92.5%
1989 0.0029 units per square kilometre +97.9%
1990 0.0067 units per square kilometre +130.8%
1991 0.0139 units per square kilometre +106.2%
1992 0.02 units per square kilometre +43.6%
1993 0.0393 units per square kilometre +96.9%
1994 0.0832 units per square kilometre +111.6%
1995 0.1671 units per square kilometre +100.8%
1996 0.3001 units per square kilometre +79.6%
1997 0.5561 units per square kilometre +85.3%
1998 0.9208 units per square kilometre +65.6%
1999 1.69 units per square kilometre +83.1%
2000 3.08 units per square kilometre +82.6%
2001 4.84 units per square kilometre +57.2%
2002 6.77 units per square kilometre +39.8%
2003 9.24 units per square kilometre +36.5%
2004 12.81 units per square kilometre +38.6%
2005 17.41 units per square kilometre +35.9%
2006 22.67 units per square kilometre +30.2%
2007 28.63 units per square kilometre +26.3%
2008 35.28 units per square kilometre +23.3%
2009 41.99 units per square kilometre +19.0%
2010 49.42 units per square kilometre +17.7%
2011 55.5 units per square kilometre +12.3%
2012 58.8 units per square kilometre +6.0%
2013 62.53 units per square kilometre +6.3%
2014 64.94 units per square kilometre +3.9%
2015 65.96 units per square kilometre +1.6%
2016 69.6 units per square kilometre +5.5%
2017 72.23 units per square kilometre +3.8%
2018 73.86 units per square kilometre +2.3%
2019 76.3 units per square kilometre +3.3%
2020 75.85 units per square kilometre -0.6%
2021 77.59 units per square kilometre +2.3%
2022 78.45 units per square kilometre +1.1%
2023 79.96 units per square kilometre +1.9%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1986 +714.9% 0 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 1
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 6
1980s 0.0006 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.3793 units per square kilometre 0.0067 units per square kilometre 1.69 units per square kilometre 10
2000s 18.27 units per square kilometre 3.08 units per square kilometre 41.99 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 64.91 units per square kilometre 49.42 units per square kilometre 76.3 units per square kilometre 10
2020s 77.96 units per square kilometre 75.85 units per square kilometre 79.96 units per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near IBRD only

  1. 10 Bermuda 1,262 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 11 Mauritius 1,054 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 12 South Korea 859.55 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 13 Aruba 782.31 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 14 Barbados 752.28 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 15 Palestine 688.53 units per square kilometre compare
  7. 16 San Marino 683.33 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 259 places →

More infrastructure data for IBRD only

All data for IBRD only →

Frequently asked questions

What is mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only?
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only was 79.96 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre recorded in IBRD only?
The highest recorded value was 79.96 units per square kilometre in 2023.
What is the lowest mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre recorded in IBRD only?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per square kilometre in 1965.
How does IBRD only rank for mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 13th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
Is mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre rising or falling in IBRD only?
Over the last ten years it is up 27.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this IBRD only data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/stat/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/stat/mobile-cellular-subscriptions-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/">Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre in IBRD only</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Mobile cellular subscriptions ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Mobile cellular subscriptions, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 11,974 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Mobile cellular subscriptions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.