Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Low income
Low income: Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre was 1.52 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Low income, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Low income is 1.52 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 46 years on record.
That represents a change of up 25.0% on the previous year and up 59.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Low income peaked at 1.52 units per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.1592 units per square kilometre, in 1970.
Low income ranks 42nd of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Low income, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.1592 units per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.1762 units per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1972 | 0.1703 units per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1973 | 0.173 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1974 | 0.1975 units per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1975 | 0.217 units per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1976 | 0.2753 units per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1977 | 0.287 units per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1978 | 0.2951 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1979 | 0.3236 units per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1980 | 0.3484 units per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1981 | 0.3669 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1982 | 0.3714 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1983 | 0.3784 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1984 | 0.382 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1985 | 0.3457 units per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1986 | 0.3731 units per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1987 | 0.3734 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1988 | 0.3859 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1989 | 0.3868 units per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1990 | 0.42 units per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1991 | 0.3695 units per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1992 | 0.3994 units per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1993 | 0.3591 units per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1994 | 0.3672 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1995 | 0.34 units per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1996 | 0.3645 units per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1997 | 0.3634 units per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1998 | 0.3669 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 0.3751 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2000 | 0.3902 units per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2001 | 0.3815 units per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2010 | 0.9104 units per square kilometre | +138.6% |
| 2011 | 1.09 units per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2012 | 0.8843 units per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2013 | 0.9512 units per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2014 | 0.9729 units per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2015 | 0.8472 units per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2016 | 0.9039 units per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2017 | 1.05 units per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2018 | 1.17 units per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2019 | 1.23 units per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2020 | 0.5246 units per square kilometre | -57.3% |
| 2021 | 0.7655 units per square kilometre | +45.9% |
| 2022 | 1.21 units per square kilometre | +58.3% |
| 2023 | 1.52 units per square kilometre | +25.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2274 units per square kilometre | 0.1592 units per square kilometre | 0.3236 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3712 units per square kilometre | 0.3457 units per square kilometre | 0.3868 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.3725 units per square kilometre | 0.34 units per square kilometre | 0.42 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3859 units per square kilometre | 0.3815 units per square kilometre | 0.3902 units per square kilometre | 2 |
| 2010s | 1 units per square kilometre | 0.8472 units per square kilometre | 1.23 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1 units per square kilometre | 0.5246 units per square kilometre | 1.52 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 39 Bahamas 146.4 units per square kilometre compare
- 40 Malaysia 142.13 units per square kilometre compare
- 41 Philippines 139.19 units per square kilometre compare
- 42 France 119.95 units per square kilometre compare
- 43 Fiji 117.93 units per square kilometre compare
- 44 Tonga 104.74 units per square kilometre compare
- 45 United States 102.93 units per square kilometre compare
More infrastructure data for Low income
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 445.00 million (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions 69.3 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 7.00 million (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions 1 per 100 people (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per capita 0.0091 units per person (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, annual growth rate 16.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Fixed telephone subscriptions, gaps filled 7.00 million (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per capita 0.5798 units per person (2025)
- Mobile cellular subscriptions, per unit of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Low income?
- Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre in Low income was 1.52 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.52 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1592 units per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Low income rank for air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre?
- Low income ranks 42nd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 59.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Air transport, passengers carried, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Air transport, passengers carried ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Air transport, passengers carried Civil Aviation Statistics of the World, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Air transport, passengers carried divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.