Croatia vs Jordan: Trademark applications, resident, by count
Trademark applications, resident, by count over time
- Croatia
- Jordan
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 3,351 against 3,242 in Jordan, a difference of 109.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 78th and Jordan ranks 79th of 135 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,329 | 3,880 | 449.25 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 4,536 | 2,569 | 1,967 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 4,079 | 2,998 | 1,082 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trademark applications, resident, by count, Croatia or Jordan?
- Croatia, at 3,351 against 3,242 in Jordan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in trademark applications, resident, by count between Croatia and Jordan?
- 109, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Jordan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Jordan rank globally for trademark applications, resident, by count?
- Croatia ranks 78th and Jordan ranks 79th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Trademark applications, resident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises. Trademarks are protected by intellectual property rights. A resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of, or acting for, the state or jurisdiction in which the first named applicant in the application is resident. Class count is used to render application data for trademark applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.