Panama vs Poland: Trademark applications, nonresident, by count
Trademark applications, nonresident, by count over time
- Panama
- Poland
How they compare
Panama currently reports 6,953 against 6,889 in Poland, a difference of 64.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Poland ahead.
Panama ranks 64th and Poland ranks 65th of 135 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,743 | 13,664 | 7,922 | Poland |
| 2010s | 7,201 | 7,679 | 478 | Poland |
| 2020s | 6,264 | 6,484 | 220 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trademark applications, nonresident, by count, Panama or Poland?
- Panama, at 6,953 against 6,889 in Poland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in trademark applications, nonresident, by count between Panama and Poland?
- 64, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Poland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Panama and Poland rank globally for trademark applications, nonresident, by count?
- Panama ranks 64th and Poland ranks 65th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Trademark applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises. Trademarks are protected by intellectual property rights. Non-resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of a state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application is not domiciled. Class count is used to render application data for trademark applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.