Jordan vs Romania: Trademark applications, nonresident, by count
Trademark applications, nonresident, by count over time
- Jordan
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 4,581 against 4,522 in Jordan, a difference of 59.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Romania ahead.
Jordan ranks 81st and Romania ranks 80th of 135 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,653 | 18,883 | 15,230 | Romania |
| 2010s | 4,407 | 5,402 | 994.5 | Romania |
| 2020s | 3,962 | 4,532 | 570 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trademark applications, nonresident, by count, Jordan or Romania?
- Romania, at 4,581 against 4,522 in Jordan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in trademark applications, nonresident, by count between Jordan and Romania?
- 59, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Romania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Jordan and Romania rank globally for trademark applications, nonresident, by count?
- Jordan ranks 81st and Romania ranks 80th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Trademark applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises. Trademarks are protected by intellectual property rights. Non-resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of a state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application is not domiciled. Class count is used to render application data for trademark applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.