Hungary vs Rwanda: Trademark applications, nonresident, by count
Trademark applications, nonresident, by count over time
- Hungary
- Rwanda
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 4,089 against 4,039 in Rwanda, a difference of 50.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 88th and Rwanda ranks 90th of 135 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,780 | 227.5 | 13,553 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 4,458 | 2,066 | 2,391 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 3,882 | 3,216 | 666 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trademark applications, nonresident, by count, Hungary or Rwanda?
- Hungary, at 4,089 against 4,039 in Rwanda as of 2021.
- What is the difference in trademark applications, nonresident, by count between Hungary and Rwanda?
- 50, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Rwanda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Hungary and Rwanda rank globally for trademark applications, nonresident, by count?
- Hungary ranks 88th and Rwanda ranks 90th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Trademark applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises. Trademarks are protected by intellectual property rights. Non-resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of a state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application is not domiciled. Class count is used to render application data for trademark applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.