Europe & Central Asia vs United Kingdom: Trademark applications, nonresident, by count

Europe & Central Asia
739,360
in 2024
United Kingdom
159,456
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia rank
4th
United Kingdom rank
3rd

Trademark applications, nonresident, by count over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • United Kingdom
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M200420142024

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia currently reports 739,360 against 159,456 in United Kingdom, a difference of 579,904.

That makes Europe & Central Asia's figure about 4.6 times United Kingdom's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Europe & Central Asia has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and United Kingdom ranks 3rd of 12 groups.

Europe & Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 552,732 23,379 529,353 Europe & Central Asia
2010s 576,638 30,671 545,967 Europe & Central Asia
2020s 788,746 159,957 628,789 Europe & Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trademark applications, nonresident, by count, Europe & Central Asia or United Kingdom?
Europe & Central Asia, at 739,360 against 159,456 in United Kingdom as of 2024.
What is the difference in trademark applications, nonresident, by count between Europe & Central Asia and United Kingdom?
579,904, with Europe & Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and United Kingdom?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia and United Kingdom rank globally for trademark applications, nonresident, by count?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and United Kingdom ranks 3rd of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Trademark applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs United Kingdom: Trademark applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid, drawing on Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/trademark-applications-nonresident-by-count/europe-and-central-asia/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/trademark-applications-nonresident-by-count/europe-and-central-asia/united-kingdom/">Europe & Central Asia vs United Kingdom: Trademark applications, nonresident, by count</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trademark applications, nonresident, by count
Source
Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
160 places, 2,555 data points, 2004–2024
Last refreshed

Trademark applications filed are applications to register a trademark with a national or regional Intellectual Property (IP) offices and designations received by relevant offices through the Madrid System. A trademark is a distinctive sign which identifies certain goods or services as those produced or provided by a specific person or enterprise. A trademark provides protection to the owner of the mark by ensuring the exclusive right to use it to identify goods or services, or to authorize another to use it in return for payment. The period of protection varies, but a trademark can be renewed indefinitely beyond the time limit on payment of additional fees. Resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of the state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application has residence. Class count is used to render application data for trademark applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.