Ethiopia vs Papua New Guinea: Trademark applications, nonresident, by count
Trademark applications, nonresident, by count over time
- Ethiopia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 906 against 878 in Ethiopia, a difference of 28.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 122nd of 135 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 291 | 476.75 | 185.75 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 1,549 | 807.71 | 740.86 | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 870 | 700 | 170 | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trademark applications, nonresident, by count, Ethiopia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 906 against 878 in Ethiopia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in trademark applications, nonresident, by count between Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea?
- 28, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Ethiopia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trademark applications, nonresident, by count?
- Ethiopia ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 122nd of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistics Database, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), published as Trademark applications, nonresident, by count. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises. Trademarks are protected by intellectual property rights. Non-resident application refers to an application filed with the IP office of or acting on behalf of a state or jurisdiction in which the first-named applicant in the application is not domiciled. Class count is used to render application data for trademark applications across offices comparable, as some offices follow a single-class/single-design filing system while other have a multiple class/design filing system.