Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
158
in 2025
Zimbabwe
885
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
35th
Zimbabwe rank
38th

Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800201220182025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 885 against 158 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 727.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.6 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 38 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 86.5 471.88 385.38 Zimbabwe
2020s 150.17 870.17 720 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reported number of standard material transfer agreements, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 885 against 158 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reported number of standard material transfer agreements between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe?
727, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe rank globally for total reported number of standard material transfer agreements?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 38 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture to the country (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/total-reported-number-of-standard-material-transfer-agreements-smtas-transferring-plant/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/total-reported-number-of-standard-material-transfer-agreements-smtas-transferring-plant/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture to the country (number)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
303 places, 4,240 data points, 2012–2025
Last refreshed