How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and East Timor?

17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Serbia vs East Timor: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)

Serbia

8.41 billion cubic meters

in 2022

East Timor

8.21 billion cubic meters

in 2022

Serbia rank

128th

East Timor rank

129th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) over time

Serbia
East Timor

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 8.41 billion cubic meters against 8.21 billion cubic meters in East Timor, a difference of 0.2 billion cubic meters.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 128th and East Timor ranks 129th of 183 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Serbia	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
2000s	8.41 billion cubic meters	8.21 billion cubic meters	0.192 billion cubic meters	Serbia
2010s	8.41 billion cubic meters	8.21 billion cubic meters	0.192 billion cubic meters	Serbia
2020s	8.41 billion cubic meters	8.21 billion cubic meters	0.192 billion cubic meters	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Serbia or East Timor?: Serbia, at 8.41 billion cubic meters against 8.21 billion cubic meters in East Timor as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Serbia and East Timor?: 0.2 billion cubic meters, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and East Timor?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Serbia and East Timor rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?: Serbia ranks 128th and East Timor ranks 129th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs East Timor: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/serbia/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/serbia/timor-leste/">Serbia vs East Timor: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit: billion cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.