How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?

17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total

Rwanda

9.5 billion cubic meters

in 2022

Serbia

8.41 billion cubic meters

in 2022

Rwanda rank

127th

Serbia rank

129th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time

Rwanda
Serbia

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 9.5 billion cubic meters against 8.41 billion cubic meters in Serbia, a difference of 1.09 billion cubic meters.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 127th and Serbia ranks 129th of 184 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Rwanda	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	9.5 billion cubic meters	8.41 billion cubic meters	1.09 billion cubic meters	Rwanda
2010s	9.5 billion cubic meters	8.41 billion cubic meters	1.09 billion cubic meters	Rwanda
2020s	9.5 billion cubic meters	8.41 billion cubic meters	1.09 billion cubic meters	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Rwanda or Serbia?: Rwanda, at 9.5 billion cubic meters against 8.41 billion cubic meters in Serbia as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Rwanda and Serbia?: 1.09 billion cubic meters, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?: Rwanda ranks 127th and Serbia ranks 129th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/rwanda/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/rwanda/serbia/">Rwanda vs Serbia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit: billion cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.