Malta vs Nauru: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)

Malta
0.0505 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Nauru
0.01 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Malta rank
178th
Nauru rank
181st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) over time

  • Malta
  • Nauru
0.010.020.030.040.05196119912022

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0505 billion cubic meters against 0.01 billion cubic meters in Nauru, a difference of 0.0405 billion cubic meters.

That makes Malta's figure about 5.0 times Nauru's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 178th and Nauru ranks 181st of 183 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0505 billion cubic meters 0.01 billion cubic meters 0.0405 billion cubic meters Malta
1970s 0.0505 billion cubic meters 0.01 billion cubic meters 0.0405 billion cubic meters Malta
1980s 0.0505 billion cubic meters 0.01 billion cubic meters 0.0405 billion cubic meters Malta
1990s 0.0505 billion cubic meters 0.01 billion cubic meters 0.0405 billion cubic meters Malta
2000s 0.0505 billion cubic meters 0.01 billion cubic meters 0.0405 billion cubic meters Malta
2010s 0.0505 billion cubic meters 0.01 billion cubic meters 0.0405 billion cubic meters Malta
2020s 0.0505 billion cubic meters 0.01 billion cubic meters 0.0405 billion cubic meters Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Malta or Nauru?
Malta, at 0.0505 billion cubic meters against 0.01 billion cubic meters in Nauru as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Malta and Nauru?
0.0405 billion cubic meters, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nauru?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Malta and Nauru rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
Malta ranks 178th and Nauru ranks 181st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Nauru: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/malta/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/malta/naoero/">Malta vs Nauru: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.