Malawi vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total

Malawi
16.14 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Slovenia
18.67 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Malawi rank
106th
Slovenia rank
103rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time

  • Malawi
  • Slovenia
05101520196119912022

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 18.67 billion cubic meters against 16.14 billion cubic meters in Malawi, a difference of 2.53 billion cubic meters.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 106th and Slovenia ranks 103rd of 183 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 16.14 billion cubic meters 18.67 billion cubic meters 2.53 billion cubic meters Slovenia
2000s 16.14 billion cubic meters 18.67 billion cubic meters 2.53 billion cubic meters Slovenia
2010s 16.14 billion cubic meters 18.67 billion cubic meters 2.53 billion cubic meters Slovenia
2020s 16.14 billion cubic meters 18.67 billion cubic meters 2.53 billion cubic meters Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Malawi or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 18.67 billion cubic meters against 16.14 billion cubic meters in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Malawi and Slovenia?
2.53 billion cubic meters, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
Malawi ranks 106th and Slovenia ranks 103rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/malawi/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/malawi/slovenia/">Malawi vs Slovenia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.