How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malawi?

31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total

Latvia

16.94 billion cubic meters

in 2022

Malawi

16.14 billion cubic meters

in 2022

Latvia rank

104th

Malawi rank

106th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time

Latvia
Malawi

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 16.94 billion cubic meters against 16.14 billion cubic meters in Malawi, a difference of 0.8 billion cubic meters.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 106th of 183 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1990s	16.94 billion cubic meters	16.14 billion cubic meters	0.8 billion cubic meters	Latvia
2000s	16.94 billion cubic meters	16.14 billion cubic meters	0.8 billion cubic meters	Latvia
2010s	16.94 billion cubic meters	16.14 billion cubic meters	0.8 billion cubic meters	Latvia
2020s	16.94 billion cubic meters	16.14 billion cubic meters	0.8 billion cubic meters	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Latvia or Malawi?: Latvia, at 16.94 billion cubic meters against 16.14 billion cubic meters in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Latvia and Malawi?: 0.8 billion cubic meters, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malawi?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Latvia and Malawi rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?: Latvia ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 106th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/latvia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/latvia/malawi/">Latvia vs Malawi: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit: billion cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 06 August 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.