High income vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total

High income
14,884 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Myanmar
1,003 billion cubic meters
in 2022
High income rank
8th
Myanmar rank
10th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time

  • High income
  • Myanmar
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119912022

How they compare

High income currently reports 14,884 billion cubic meters against 1,003 billion cubic meters in Myanmar, a difference of 13,881 billion cubic meters.

That makes High income's figure about 14.8 times Myanmar's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, High income has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 8th and Myanmar ranks 10th of 44 groups.

High income has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 10,445 billion cubic meters 1,003 billion cubic meters 9,442 billion cubic meters High income
1970s 10,446 billion cubic meters 1,003 billion cubic meters 9,443 billion cubic meters High income
1980s 10,446 billion cubic meters 1,003 billion cubic meters 9,443 billion cubic meters High income
1990s 13,994 billion cubic meters 1,003 billion cubic meters 12,992 billion cubic meters High income
2000s 14,885 billion cubic meters 1,003 billion cubic meters 13,882 billion cubic meters High income
2010s 14,885 billion cubic meters 1,003 billion cubic meters 13,882 billion cubic meters High income
2020s 14,885 billion cubic meters 1,003 billion cubic meters 13,882 billion cubic meters High income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, High income or Myanmar?
High income, at 14,884 billion cubic meters against 1,003 billion cubic meters in Myanmar as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between High income and Myanmar?
13,881 billion cubic meters, with High income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Myanmar?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do High income and Myanmar rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
High income ranks 8th and Myanmar ranks 10th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/high-income/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/high-income/myanmar/">High income vs Myanmar: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.