Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)

Euro area
1,068 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Iceland
170 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Euro area rank
37th
Iceland rank
40th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) over time

  • Euro area
  • Iceland
2004006008001.0k196119912022

How they compare

Euro area currently reports 1,068 billion cubic meters against 170 billion cubic meters in Iceland, a difference of 898 billion cubic meters.

That makes Euro area's figure about 6.3 times Iceland's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Euro area has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 37th and Iceland ranks 40th of 46 groups.

Euro area has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 953.53 billion cubic meters 170 billion cubic meters 783.53 billion cubic meters Euro area
1970s 953.53 billion cubic meters 170 billion cubic meters 783.53 billion cubic meters Euro area
1980s 953.53 billion cubic meters 170 billion cubic meters 783.53 billion cubic meters Euro area
1990s 1,044 billion cubic meters 170 billion cubic meters 873.53 billion cubic meters Euro area
2000s 1,068 billion cubic meters 170 billion cubic meters 897.61 billion cubic meters Euro area
2010s 1,068 billion cubic meters 170 billion cubic meters 897.61 billion cubic meters Euro area
2020s 1,068 billion cubic meters 170 billion cubic meters 897.61 billion cubic meters Euro area

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Euro area or Iceland?
Euro area, at 1,068 billion cubic meters against 170 billion cubic meters in Iceland as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Euro area and Iceland?
898 billion cubic meters, with Euro area ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Iceland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Euro area and Iceland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
Euro area ranks 37th and Iceland ranks 40th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/euro-area/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/euro-area/iceland/">Euro area vs Iceland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.