How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?

31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total

Estonia

12.71 billion cubic meters

in 2022

Zimbabwe

12.26 billion cubic meters

in 2022

Estonia rank

115th

Zimbabwe rank

118th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time

Estonia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 12.71 billion cubic meters against 12.26 billion cubic meters in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.45 billion cubic meters.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 184 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Estonia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	12.71 billion cubic meters	12.26 billion cubic meters	0.45 billion cubic meters	Estonia
2000s	12.71 billion cubic meters	12.26 billion cubic meters	0.45 billion cubic meters	Estonia
2010s	12.71 billion cubic meters	12.26 billion cubic meters	0.45 billion cubic meters	Estonia
2020s	12.71 billion cubic meters	12.26 billion cubic meters	0.45 billion cubic meters	Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Estonia or Zimbabwe?: Estonia, at 12.71 billion cubic meters against 12.26 billion cubic meters in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Estonia and Zimbabwe?: 0.45 billion cubic meters, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?: Estonia ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/estonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/estonia/zimbabwe/">Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit: billion cubic meters
Source: AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.