Ecuador vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total

Ecuador
442.4 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Malaysia
580 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Ecuador rank
18th
Malaysia rank
15th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
0200400600196119912022

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 580 billion cubic meters against 442.4 billion cubic meters in Ecuador, a difference of 137.6 billion cubic meters.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 18th and Malaysia ranks 15th of 183 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 442.4 billion cubic meters 580 billion cubic meters 137.6 billion cubic meters Malaysia
1970s 442.4 billion cubic meters 580 billion cubic meters 137.6 billion cubic meters Malaysia
1980s 442.4 billion cubic meters 580 billion cubic meters 137.6 billion cubic meters Malaysia
1990s 442.4 billion cubic meters 580 billion cubic meters 137.6 billion cubic meters Malaysia
2000s 442.4 billion cubic meters 580 billion cubic meters 137.6 billion cubic meters Malaysia
2010s 442.4 billion cubic meters 580 billion cubic meters 137.6 billion cubic meters Malaysia
2020s 442.4 billion cubic meters 580 billion cubic meters 137.6 billion cubic meters Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 580 billion cubic meters against 442.4 billion cubic meters in Ecuador as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Ecuador and Malaysia?
137.6 billion cubic meters, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
Ecuador ranks 18th and Malaysia ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/ecuador/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/ecuador/malaysia/">Ecuador vs Malaysia: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.