Cape Verde vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total

Cape Verde
0.3 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Singapore
0.6 billion cubic meters
in 2022
Cape Verde rank
168th
Singapore rank
165th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Singapore
00.20.40.6196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.6 billion cubic meters against 0.3 billion cubic meters in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.3 billion cubic meters.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.0 times Cape Verde's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 168th and Singapore ranks 165th of 183 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
1970s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
1980s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
1990s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
2000s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
2010s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore
2020s 0.3 billion cubic meters 0.6 billion cubic meters 0.3 billion cubic meters Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Cape Verde or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.6 billion cubic meters against 0.3 billion cubic meters in Cape Verde as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Cape Verde and Singapore?
0.3 billion cubic meters, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Cape Verde and Singapore rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
Cape Verde ranks 168th and Singapore ranks 165th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total. Statizoid, drawing on AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/cabo-verde/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters/cabo-verde/singapore/">Cape Verde vs Singapore: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Unit
billion cubic meters
Source
AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
229 places, 13,161 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.