Bolivia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) over time
- Bolivia
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 3,884 billion cubic meters against 303.5 billion cubic meters in Bolivia, a difference of 3,580 billion cubic meters.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 12.8 times Bolivia's.
Across all 62 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 26th of 183 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 303.5 billion cubic meters | 3,729 billion cubic meters | 3,425 billion cubic meters | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 303.5 billion cubic meters | 3,729 billion cubic meters | 3,425 billion cubic meters | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 303.5 billion cubic meters | 3,729 billion cubic meters | 3,425 billion cubic meters | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 303.5 billion cubic meters | 3,816 billion cubic meters | 3,513 billion cubic meters | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 303.5 billion cubic meters | 3,854 billion cubic meters | 3,550 billion cubic meters | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 303.5 billion cubic meters | 3,878 billion cubic meters | 3,574 billion cubic meters | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 303.5 billion cubic meters | 3,884 billion cubic meters | 3,580 billion cubic meters | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Bolivia or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 3,884 billion cubic meters against 303.5 billion cubic meters in Bolivia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Bolivia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 3,580 billion cubic meters, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Bolivia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
- Bolivia ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 26th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.