Australia vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Renewable internal freshwater resources, total
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total over time
- Australia
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
How they compare
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) currently reports 8,783 billion cubic meters against 492 billion cubic meters in Australia, a difference of 8,291 billion cubic meters.
That makes East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s figure about 17.9 times Australia's.
Across all 62 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 16th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 16th of 183 countries.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 492 billion cubic meters | 8,772 billion cubic meters | 8,280 billion cubic meters | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 492 billion cubic meters | 8,783 billion cubic meters | 8,291 billion cubic meters | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 492 billion cubic meters | 8,783 billion cubic meters | 8,291 billion cubic meters | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 492 billion cubic meters | 8,783 billion cubic meters | 8,291 billion cubic meters | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 492 billion cubic meters | 8,783 billion cubic meters | 8,291 billion cubic meters | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 492 billion cubic meters | 8,783 billion cubic meters | 8,291 billion cubic meters | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 492 billion cubic meters | 8,783 billion cubic meters | 8,291 billion cubic meters | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total, Australia or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), at 8,783 billion cubic meters against 492 billion cubic meters in Australia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total between Australia and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 8,291 billion cubic meters, with East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do Australia and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total?
- Australia ranks 16th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 16th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources flows refer to internal renewable resources (internal river flows and groundwater from rainfall) in the country.