Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Sri Lanka
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Uganda
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Sri Lanka rank
72nd
Uganda rank
70th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Uganda
00000196119912022

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 72nd and Uganda ranks 70th of 181 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Sri Lanka or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Sri Lanka and Uganda?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uganda?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Sri Lanka and Uganda rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Sri Lanka ranks 72nd and Uganda ranks 70th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/sri-lanka/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/sri-lanka/uganda/">Sri Lanka vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.