South Africa vs United States of America: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)
South Africa
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
United States of America
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Africa rank
132nd
United States of America rank
134th
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time
- South Africa
- United States of America
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in United States of America, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.
South Africa ranks 132nd and United States of America ranks 134th of 181 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | United States of America |
| 1970s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | United States of America |
| 1980s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | United States of America |
| 1990s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | United States of America |
| 2000s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | United States of America |
| 2010s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | United States of America |
| 2020s | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), South Africa or United States of America?
- South Africa, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in United States of America as of 2022.
- What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between South Africa and United States of America?
- 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United States of America?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do South Africa and United States of America rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
- South Africa ranks 132nd and United States of America ranks 134th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.