Rwanda vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Rwanda
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Uganda
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Rwanda rank
73rd
Uganda rank
70th

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Uganda
00000196119912022

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 73rd and Uganda ranks 70th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Rwanda or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Rwanda and Uganda?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uganda?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and Uganda rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Rwanda ranks 73rd and Uganda ranks 70th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/rwanda/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/rwanda/uganda/">Rwanda vs Uganda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.