Norway vs Rwanda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Norway
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Rwanda
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Norway rank
76th
Rwanda rank
73rd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Norway
  • Rwanda
00000196119912022

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Norway ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 181 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Norway or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Norway and Rwanda?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Rwanda?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Norway and Rwanda rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Norway ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Rwanda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/rwanda/">Norway vs Rwanda: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.