Nepal vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Nepal
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Nepal rank
29th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
31st

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Nepal
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00000196119912022

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 29th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 181 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Nepal or Sao Tome and Principe?
Nepal, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Nepal and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Sao Tome and Principe?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Nepal and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Nepal ranks 29th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 31st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/sao-tome-and-principe/">Nepal vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.