Naoero vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)

Naoero
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Switzerland
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Naoero rank
149th
Switzerland rank
152nd

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) over time

  • Naoero
  • Switzerland
0000196119912022

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Switzerland, a difference of 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.2 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Switzerland ahead.

Naoero ranks 149th and Switzerland ranks 152nd of 181 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 4 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Switzerland Difference Ahead
1970s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Switzerland
1980s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Switzerland
1990s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Naoero
2000s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Naoero
2010s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Naoero
2020s 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic), Naoero or Switzerland?
Naoero, at 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP against 0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP in Switzerland as of 2022.
What is the difference in renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic) between Naoero and Switzerland?
0 billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Switzerland?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Naoero and Switzerland rank globally for renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)?
Naoero ranks 149th and Switzerland ranks 152nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/naoero/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://infrastructure.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-internal-freshwater-resources-total-billion-cubic-meters-per-unit-of-gdp/naoero/switzerland/">Naoero vs Switzerland: Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters), per unit of GDP
Unit
billion cubic meters per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 12,317 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.